This book challenges, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity. The author claims that we have a false view of our own nature; that it is often rational to act against our own best interests; that most of us have moral views that are directly self-defeating; and that, when we consider future generations the conclusions will often be disturbing. He concludes that moral non-religious moral philosophy is a young subject, with a promising but unpredictable future.

This book will teach you the practical riches of saying it well with good words, neglected words, precise words for vocabular exaltation.

A collection of unusual and amusing words.

Law of Persons is the foundation of the law. It is impossible for an individual to understand the other branches of the law such as family law, contract law, commercial law, and others without knowing the law of persons. The book explains the basic concepts and principles of the Turkish law of persons clearly and concisely. It also shows the provision of the Turkish Civil Code relating to the law of persons. The target audience of the book is students and jurists who want to more about the Turkish law of persons. Some concepts the book cover are: Definition of Person, Natural Persons, Legal Persons, Sources of Law of Persons, Personality, Beginning of Personality, Legal Status of Unborn Person, Death, Legal Consequences of Death, Presumption of Death, Legal Consequences of the Presumption of Death, Presumption of Simultaneous Death, Absence, The Capacity for Rights, The capacity to Act, Personality Rights, Characteristics of the Personality Rights, Claims for Protection Personality Rights, The Right of Rectification and Reply, Acquisition of a Name, Types of Names, Usurpation of a Name, Concept of Kinship, Blood Kinship (Consanguinity), Affinal kinship, Legal Consequences of Kinship, Definition of Domicile, Civil Status Registers, Concept of Legal Person, Definition of Association, Formation of an Association, Termination of Association, Definition of Foundation, Organization of Foundations, Dissolution of Foundation

Convinced that the crisis in contemporary Western philosophy rises from the sundering of moral or value considerations from notions of rationality and the nature of reality, Deutsch (philosophy, U. of Hawai'i) advocates a kind of pluralistic but not relativistic philosophical anthropology, ontology, ethics, and epistemology in a cross-cultural context. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR

The concept of personhood is central to a wide range of contemporary issues, ranging from reproductive rights to the death penalty and euthanasia. We may think that the concept of person is a modern development. In fact, however, this idea does not originate with our discovery of human rights, consciousness, and individuality. In this study Lucian Turcescu shows that the fourth-century theologian Gregory of Nyssa developed a very sophisticated concept of the person in the context of his attempts to clarify the paradox of the Trinity-a single God comprising three distinct persons. Turcescu offers the first in-depth analysis of Gregory's writings about the divine persons. He shows that Gregory understood personhood as characterized by uniqueness, relationality, and freedom. He reasoned that the three persons of the Trinity have distinctive properties that make them individuals, that is, capable of being enumerated and circumscribed. But this idea of individuation, inherited from the neo-Platonists, falls short of expressing a clear notion of personal uniqueness. By itself it would suggest that a person is merely a collection of properties. Gregory's great contribution was to perceive the importance of relationality to personhood. The three divine persons know and love each other, are in communion with each other, and freely act together in their common will. This understanding, argues Turcescu, adds up to a concept of personal uniqueness much like our modern one. Turcescu's work not only contributes to our knowledge of the history of Trinitarian theology but can be helpful to theologians who are dealing with issues in contemporary ethics.