Descendents of some of the rulers of the former princely states of India; includes a brief ancestral lineage.

Although the princes of India have been caricatured as oriental despots and British stooges, Barbara Ramusack's study argues that the British did not create the princes. On the contrary, many were consummate politicians who exercised considerable degrees of autonomy until the disintegration of the princely states after independence. Ramusack's synthesis has a broad temporal span, tracing the evolution of the Indian kings from their pre-colonial origins to their roles as clients in the British colonial system. The book breaks ground in its integration of political and economic developments in the major princely states with the shifting relationships between the princes and the British. It represents a major contribution, both to British imperial history in its analysis of the theory and practice of indirect rule, and to modern South Asian history, as a portrait of the princes as politicians and patrons of the arts.

Ever Since The Indian Independence It Has Been Normally Understood That The Indian States And Estates Which Numbered Six Hundred On 15Th August 1947 Were The Symbols Of Incompetence, Oppression And Vices. The States Has A Very Peculiar Status In The Political Theory Which Grew Up In India In The 19Th Century. They Did Not Form Part Of The British Indian Empire Nor Were They Sovereign Powers. The State Were Neither Feudatories Of The Government Of India, Nor Protectorates And Nor Merely Allies Either. The Present Publication Contains The Biographical Sketches Of The Princes And Leading Officials And Non-Officials Of The Erstwhile States And Estates Of Indian Sub-Continent. Author Intends To Show That They Symbolised Progressiveness And Also The Conservators Of Indian Social And Cultural Traditions. The Detailed Introduction Sets Forth The Historical Context And An Analytical Framework. The Book Is Going To Make A Lively Study Of The Laymen As Well As Serious Students Of History. The Detailed Introduction Sets Forth The Historical Context And An Analytical Framework. Contents Section-I : Princes Of India Salute States; Alirajpur, Alwar, Bahawalpur, Banganapalle, Bansda, Baoni (Kadaura), Baria, Baroda, Benares, Bharatpur, Bhavnagar, Bhopal, Bhor, Bijawar, Bikaner, Bilaspur (Kahlur), Cambay, Chamba, Chhatarpur, Chhota Udaipur, Cochin, Cooch Behar, Cutch, Datia, Dewas (Junior), Dewas (Senior), Dhar, Dharampur, Dholpur, Dungarpur, Faridkot, Gondal Gwalior, Hyderabad, Idar, Indore, Jaipur, Jaisalmer, Jammu And Kashmir, Janjira, Jaora, Jawhar, Jhabua, Jhalawar, Jind, Jodhpur, Junagarh, Kalahandi, Kalat, Kapurthala, Karauli, Kishangarh, Kolhapur, Kotah, Kutch, Loharu, Lunawada, Malerkotla, Mandi, Manipur, Mayurbhanj, Mewar, Morvi, Mudhol, Mysore, Nabha, Nagod, Narsingarh, Nawanagar, Orchha (Tikamgarh), Palanpur, Palitana, Panna, Partabgarh, Patiala, Patna, Porbandar, Pudukottai, Radhanpur, Rajgarh, Rajkot, Rajpipla, Rampur, Tatlam, Rewa, Sachin, Sailana, Samthar, Sangli, Sant, Shahpura, Sirmoor, Sirohi, Sitamau, Sonepur, Suket, Tehri-Garhwal, Tonk, Travancore, Tripura, Udaipur, Wankaner; Section-Ii: Princes Of India Non-Saluted States; Akalkot, Ambliara, Anandpur Taluka, Athgarh, Athmalik, Aundh, Baghat, Bamra, Bantwa Taluka, Baramba, Baramba, Barwala Taluka, Baudh, Bhadarwa, Bihat, Bonai, Chhaliar, Chhuikhandan, Daspalla, Dedhrota Taluka, Dhami, Dehnkanal, Gad Boriad,Gangpur, Garrauli, Ghodasar, Hapa Taluka, Hindol, Ichalkaranji, Ilol, Jambughoda, Jamkhandi, Jasdan, Jath, Jobat, Jubbal, Kadoli Taluka, Kalsia, Kawardha, Keonjhar, Khairagarh, Khandpara, Kharsawan, Khedawada Taluka, Khirasra, Korea, Kushalgarh, Kuthar, Lathi, Likhi, Malpur, Mandwa, Mirja (Junior), Mirja (Senior), Nalagarh (Hindur), Narsingpur, Naswadi, Nayagarh, Nilgiri, Palasni, Pal-Lahara, Pataudi, Pethapur, Phaltan, Poonch, Punadra, Raigarh, Rairakhol, Ramas, Ramdrug, Ranasan, Ratanmal, Sanor, Sarangarh, Sarila, Savanpur, Seraikela, Sihora, Sirguja, Swat, Talcher, Vadagam, Vadia, Valasna, Wadi Estate; Section-Iii: Who S Who In India; Leading Officials And Non-Officials, Ministers, Members Of Legislature, Zamindars & Other Personages; Section-Iv: Supplementary Section.

India’s Princely States covered nearly 40 per cent of the Indian subcontinent at the time of Indian independence, and they collapsed after the departure of the British. This book provides a chronological analysis of the Princely State in colonial times and its post-colonial legacies. Focusing on one of the largest and most important of these states, the Princely State of Mysore, it offers a novel interpretation and thorough investigation of the relationship of king and subject in South Asia. The book argues that the denial of political and economic power to the king, especially after 1831 when direct British control was imposed over the state administration in Mysore, was paralleled by a counter-balancing multiplication of kingly ritual, rites, and social duties. The book looks at how, at the very time when kingly authority was lacking income and powers of patronage, its local sources of power and social roots were being reinforced and rebuilt in a variety of ways. Using a combination of historical and anthropological methodologies, and based upon substantial archival and field research, the book argues that the idea of kingship lived on in South India and continues to play a vital and important role in contemporary South Indian social and political life. The Open Access version of this book, available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

The highly anticipated follow-up to the critically acclaimed novel The Widows of Malabar Hill. India, 1922: It is rainy season in the lush, remote Sahyadri mountains, where the princely state of Satapur is tucked away. A curse seems to have fallen upon Satapur’s royal family, whose maharaja died of a sudden illness shortly before his teenage son was struck down in a tragic hunting accident. The state is now ruled by an agent of the British Raj on behalf of Satapur’s two maharanis, the dowager queen and her daughter-in-law. The royal ladies are in a dispute over the education of the young crown prince, and a lawyer’s counsel is required. However, the maharanis live in purdah and do not speak to men. Just one person can help them: Perveen Mistry, Bombay’s only female lawyer. Perveen is determined to bring peace to the royal house and make a sound recommendation for the young prince’s future, but she arrives to find that the Satapur palace is full of cold-blooded power plays and ancient vendettas. Too late, she realizes she has walked into a trap. But whose? And how can she protect the royal children from the palace’s deadly curse?

Hints on the Art and Science of Government was the first treatise on statecraft produced in modern India. It consists of lectures that Raja Sir T. Madhava Rao delivered in 1881 to Sayaji Rao Gaekwad III, the young Maharaja of Baroda. Universally considered the foremost Indian statesman of the nineteenth century, Madhava Rao had served as dewan (or prime minister) in the native states of Travancore, Indore and Baroda. Under his command, Travancore and Baroda came to be seen as ‘model states’, whose progress demonstrated that Indians were capable of governing well. Rao’s lectures summarise the fundamental principles underlying his unprecedented success. He explains how and why a Maharaja ought to marry the classical Indian ideal of raj dharma, which enjoins rulers to govern dutifully, with the modern English ideal of limited sovereignty. This makes Hints an exceptionally important text: it shows how, outside the confines of British India, Indians consciously and creatively sought to revise and adapt ideals in the interests of progress. This landmark edition contains both the newly rediscovered, original lecture manuscripts; and an authoritative introduction, outlining Rao’s remarkable career, his complicated relationship with Sayaji Rao III, and the reasons why his lectures have been neglected–until now.

Conquering the maharajas demonstrates that the political and military clashes between the Indian and Pakistani governments and the princely states, a legacy of the layered sovereignty of British indirect rule in India, was a product of the competing ideas of state sovereignty leading up to and following the transfer of power in 1947.