The Best of the Journal of Irreproducible Results
Title | The Best of the Journal of Irreproducible Results PDF eBook |
Author | George H. Scherr |
Publisher | Workman Publishing |
Total Pages | 212 |
Release | 1983 |
Genre | Humor |
ISBN |
The Journal of Irreproducible Results is the magazine that has stood for years as the definitive parody of scholarly and scientific journals everywhere. This anthology collects its greatest moments. Selection of the Library of Science Book and the Book-of-the-Month Science Book clubs. 81,000 copies in print.
The Journal of Irreproducible Results
Title | The Journal of Irreproducible Results PDF eBook |
Author | |
Publisher | |
Total Pages | 76 |
Release | 1981 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN |
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
Title | Reproducibility and Replicability in Science PDF eBook |
Author | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
Publisher | National Academies Press |
Total Pages | 257 |
Release | 2019-10-20 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN | 0309486165 |
One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science.
Medically Speaking
Title | Medically Speaking PDF eBook |
Author | C.C. Gaither |
Publisher | CRC Press |
Total Pages | 597 |
Release | 2019-04-23 |
Genre | Medical |
ISBN | 0429525648 |
Medically Speaking: A Dictionary of Quotations on Dentistry, Medicine, and Nursing contains over 1,500 quotes pertinent and especially illuminating to these disciplines. Here you will find quotations from the most famous to the unknown. Some are profound, some are witty, some are wise but none are frivolous. The extensive author and subject indexes
The Journal of Irreproducible Results
Title | The Journal of Irreproducible Results PDF eBook |
Author | George H. Scherr |
Publisher | |
Total Pages | 287 |
Release | 1975 |
Genre | |
ISBN |
The Journal of Irreproducible Results
Title | The Journal of Irreproducible Results PDF eBook |
Author | George H. Scherr |
Publisher | |
Total Pages | 328 |
Release | 1986 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN |
Fostering Integrity in Research
Title | Fostering Integrity in Research PDF eBook |
Author | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
Publisher | National Academies Press |
Total Pages | 327 |
Release | 2018-01-13 |
Genre | Science |
ISBN | 0309391253 |
The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support â€" or distort â€" practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge. The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated. Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.