Master's Thesis from the year 2016 in the subject Politics - Region: Middle and South America, grade: A, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Facultat de Ciències Polítiques i de Sociologia), course: Political Science - Master Research, language: English, abstract: The objective of this book is to compare different historical cases of internal armed conflicts in America, to identify the common conditions that previously recorded the cessation of armed actions and beginning of dialogues as a path for starting building a post-conflict scenario. For this purpose, I will make a comparative historical analysis of three armed conflicts in Latin America who opted for the "dialogue" as a mechanism to end the confrontation with the state. The objective of this exercise is to identify the common elements, if any, that existed in the different selected cases when they decided to engage in conversations officially. With the identification of these elements, I intend to demonstrate that there is a common causal explanation of the outcome of the cases, represented as a minimum necessary conditions in the historical development of different armed conflicts to achieve the implementation and development of dialogs between non-governmental armed groups and their governments. The outcome of this work will be the identification of patterns of dynamics of internal armed conflicts based on the research findings, which will serve as a reference material for the study and possible early resolutions of armed conflicts in their social and political dimension stating the dialogue as an effective means to armed conflict resolution and there are enabling conditions that make it successful.

Dialogue is typically hailed as a progressive force fostering mutual understanding and resolving conflicts. Can it really carry such a burden? Does dialogue really resolve conflicts? In this unique volume international experts critically assess the political role of dialogue, addressing its potential and limitations. Bringing fascinating insights to bear they examine the theoretical underpinnings and conceptual boundaries of dialogue as a tool for conflict resolution. Major recent crises such as the Russo-Georgian war in 2008, the conflict between Western powers and Gaddafi’s Libya, arguments over Iran’s nuclear programme, religious tensions in Egypt after the Arab Spring, the Afghan case, the Sudanese experience and the recent Russo-Ukraine conflict are all considered and the conflict resolution attempts discussed. Using these cases the contributors explore in depth the nature of the dialogue between the actors, the extent to which it worked and what determined its impact.

What role does dialogue play in peacebuilding? How can community-based activities contribute to broader peace processes? What can participatory research methods add to local efforts to build peace? In this book, the authors examine these questions through their work with two different Colombian communities who have pursued dialogue amidst ongoing violence, environmental injustice and socio-economic challenges. By reflecting on what people in these contrasting places have achieved through participatory peacebuilding, the authors explore different forms of local agency, the prospects for non-extractive academic engagement, and practical and theoretical lessons for participating in peace in other conflict-affected settings.

Ending War: A Dialogue across Disciplines examines how wars end from a multidisciplinary perspective and includes enquiries into the politics of war, the laws of war, and the military and intellectual history of war. In recent years, the changes in the character of contemporary warfare have created uncertainties across different disciplines about how to identify and conceptualise the end of war. A whole constellation of questions arises from such uncertainties: How do philosophers define ethical responsibilities in bello and post bellum if the boundary between war and peace is ever so blurred? How do strategists define their objectives if the teleology of action becomes uncertain? How do historians bracket the known endings of war and delve into the arguments that preceded them? Which answers can international law provide for the ending of wars – and which challenges remain or have recently arisen? This volume addresses these questions and enables both an understanding of how ‘the end’ as a concept informs the understanding of war in international relations, in international law, and in history, as well as a reconsideration of the nature of scientific method in the field of war studies as such. The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of The Journal of Strategic Studies.

Within the dynamic and diverse country of Veridonia, a proud country faced a challenging situation. Veridonia found itself entrapped in a territorial dispute with its neighboring nation, Solara. The debate spun around a resource-rich border region claimed by both countries, starting tensions and raising the specter of war. Rather than turning to armed conflict, in any case, the diplomatic leaders of Veridonia saw an opportunity for a diverse way. They accepted within the power of dialogue, understanding, and cooperation to resolve the conflict peacefully. With extraordinary assurance, Veridonia decided to set out on a journey of conflict resolution and diplomatic dialogue. To begin with, the Veridonian government started direct talks with Solara, advertising an olive department to seek a collaborative solution. The pioneers of both countries engaged in seriously negotiations, facilitated by skilled mediators and diplomats from international organizations. These talks took put in neutral, peaceful areas, enabling an environment conducive to meaningful and productive dialogue. As the negotiations unfolded, Veridonia realized that the key to resolving the dispute lay in recognizing the fundamental needs and interface of both nations. They understood that compromise and shared understanding were foremost for a quiet resolution. Rather than persistently holding onto their initial demands, Veridonia's diplomatic group illustrated adaptability and eagerness to find common ground. In parallel, Veridonia propelled a comprehensive open mindfulness campaign, promoting the benefits of dialogue and the critical results of war. The government organized town hall meetings, public debates, and educational activities to encourage citizens' engagement and back for the quiet approach. Over time, the efforts of Veridonia begun yielding positive results. The dialogs became more helpful, and both sides moved away from confrontational talk and towards collaborative problem-solving. They began exploring imaginative solutions that addressed the interests of both nations, including asset sharing, joint development projects, and cultural exchanges to foster mutual understanding. Within the spirit of fostering lasting peace, Veridonia proposed the foundation of a joint committee comprised of representatives from both countries. This committee would be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the agreed-upon arrangements, guaranteeing that the peace achieved was economical and advantageous to both countries. Through persistence, diligence, and immovable commitment, Veridonia and Solara eventually reached a point of interest agreement. The border dispute was resolved peacefully, and a modern era of cooperation and friendship started between the two nations. The joint committee kept on meet frequently, fostering progressing dialogue to address any emerging issues promptly. Veridonia's chosen way of conflict resolution and political dialogue stood as a sparkling illustration to the world. Its victory illustrated that indeed the foremost complex and possibly dangerous situations can be resolved without resorting to war. The country's decision to prioritize peace not only spared countless lives but also paved the way for a long-lasting and prosperous relationship with its neighbor.

Diasporas in Dialogue is an indispensable guide for those leading or participating in dialogue processes, especially in ethnically diverse communities. The text offers both a theoretical and practical framework for dialogue, providing insight into the needs, assets and challenges of working in this capacity. The first book to offer structured processes for dialogue with refugee communities - demonstrates how diaspora communities can be engaged in dialogue that heals, reconciles and builds peace Relates the story of the Portland Diaspora Dialogue Project, a remarkable collaboration between university researchers and African community activists committed to helping newly arrived refugees Written accessibly to provide practitioners, academics, and community members with a simple and cogent account of how, step by step, the process of healing communities and re-building can begin Published at a critical time in the face of the worldwide refugee crisis, and offers helpful frameworks and practical tools for dialogue in situations where individuals and communities are displaced