Is there a law that can protect U.S. industries from imported products made with conflict minerals or child labor? Is there a law that can combat trade practices that harm the environment? Is there a law that can protect American consumers from food and drugs imported from unsafe facilities? According to Washington, DC attorneys Michael Buckler and Beau Jackson, the answer to these questions is yes: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 can be an effective weapon against such practices. In the lead article of the spring 2014 edition of the Federal Circuit Bar Journal, Messrs. Buckler and Jackson examine how Section 337, a trade statute administered by the U.S. International Trade Commission, could be used to redress unfair methods of competition that are objectionable on social or ethical grounds. Most Section 337 investigations involve allegations of intellectual property infringement, but the statute exists to protect U.S. industries and the American public from a broad range of unfair acts in the context of imported goods. Section 337 offers complainants a uniquely powerful remedy: the exclusion of unfairly traded imports from the United States. This article analyzes the relevant statutory language and its legislative history, addresses the core elements of proving a violation of Section 337, and discusses ancillary considerations the ITC may consider in a case seeking to combat novel types of unfairness. The article then describes four examples of unfairness potentially actionable under Section 337: trading in conflict minerals, use of child labor, environmental degradation, and unsafe food and drug practices. This article is relevant to companies, trade associations, and public interest groups seeking creative ways to challenge unfair trade practices.