This book presents the latest thinking to help governments achieve policy coherence in support of development. It provides a synthesis of lessons learned from peer reviews, specific case studies, and recent workshops.

This publication considers examples of good institutional practice among OECD countries which is designed to promote policy coherence in support of development objectives. It examines the lessons to be learned from peer reviews of OECD countries, specific case studies and recent workshops; as well as looking at practical ways forward for mustering political will, building analytical capacity, improving co-ordination mechanisms, and taking action in specific priority areas.

This book presents scenarios showing numerical results of changes to individual environment/development policies as well as policy packages implemented simultaneously by OECD and developing countries, confirming the need for policy coherence.

The 2030 Agenda is a universal, collective responsibility that covers all levels: global, national and territorial. To address global policy challenges in a complex and interconnected world, policy coherence will be key. A more coherent multilateral system will be essential to reconcile ...

The principle of policy coherence has been the object of a contentious debate in the European Union’s external relations, though discussions have been mainly limited to its foreign policy and its ability to speak with one voice in the international arena. Despite being institutionalised in the Treaty of Maastricht, policy coherence for development (PCD), which implies taking into account the needs and interests of developing countries in non-aid policies, failed to make headway in the European Union, remaining the unheeded concern of some NGOs and a small group of Member States. A change of direction occurred in the early 2000s when the European Commission, taking advantage of a number of favourable conditions and using an astute strategy, managed to set an ambitious agenda for the European Union. This volume analyses the linkages between aid and various non-aid policies, namely trade, agriculture, fisheries, security, migration, and the social dimension of globalisation. Its aim is to shed new light on the EU’s policy-making process, by looking at the nexus between various policy sub-systems, and on the role that the EU wants to play in the international arena, by looking at the impact of its policies on international development. This book was published as a special issue of the Journal of European Integration.

Abstract: "Der von der Bundesregierung national wie international anerkannte entwicklungspolitische Kohärenzanspruch bedeutet, dass neben der Entwicklungspolitik auch andere Politiken eine Mitverantwortung für die Erreichung übergeordneter Entwicklungsziele wie Armutsbekämpfung und globale Zukunftssicherung haben und in dem Sinne kohärent sein sollen. Die vorliegende Studie, die auf einem umfassenderen Gutachten für das Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) beruht, befasst sich mit der Begründung und der Anerkennung sowie der Reichweite und den Grenzen des entwicklungspolitischen Kohärenzanspruchs und legt dann im Lichte internationaler Erfahrungen dar, dass zu seiner Umsetzung ein komplexes 'Kohärenzmanagement' erforderlich ist. Die Studie formuliert dazu eine Reihe von Empfehlungen." (Autorenreferat)

What does policy coherence for development mean? Increasing global integration through trade, capital and labour mobility brings increasing mutual responsibilities and mutual policy repercussions. These realities call for greater coherence between ...