"In 1972, the filmmaker John Luther Schofill lured two promising students, Bill Brand and Louis Hock, to the School of the Art Institute of Chicago to join the newly inaugurated film department. Brand was tantalized by the prospect of getting his hands on the school's optical printer, which would allow him to submit his images to repetition, multiplication, and other forms of synthetic transformation through rephotography. For several years, the promise of rephotography had inspired Brand to invent one-off devices for his own films and those of Paul Sharits, his mentor at Antioch College. Upon arrival in Chicago, however, Brand learned that, in fact, no printer existed--he had been recruited to build one. Meanwhile, Hock found himself in need of a financial stipend. At Schofill's behest, the pair was charged with fashioning a newly purchased Mauer camera and a heavy industrial lathe bed into a do-it-yourself (DIY) optical printer--"one piece at a time, putting things in place, modified as we went along," Hock recalled. Homemade optical printers (and their mass-produced offshoot, the JK optical printer) were appearing at other schools, too, providing the first generation of experimental film students with easier access to the technology. Within a decade, the optical printer became a mainstay of MFA programs and filmmaker's cooperatives, as fundamental to avant-garde practice as Bolex cameras and reversal stocks. Meanwhile, the practice itself became routinized, a skill that could be acquired. In hindsight, P. Adams Sitney remarked, "just as rapid editing with invisible splice marks had, for many filmmakers, become a mark of aesthetic authority in the early sixties, optical printing represented technical mastery in the seventies." His observation affirms that technical sophistication had become an important distinction in experimental filmmaking, but it also suggests that the optical printer came to instantiate aesthetic, cultural, and even philosophical values. What were these values, and where did they come from?"--

"In 1972, the filmmaker John Luther Schofill lured two promising students, Bill Brand and Louis Hock, to the School of the Art Institute of Chicago to join the newly inaugurated film department. Brand was tantalized by the prospect of getting his hands on the school's optical printer, which would allow him to submit his images to repetition, multiplication, and other forms of synthetic transformation through rephotography. For several years, the promise of rephotography had inspired Brand to invent one-off devices for his own films and those of Paul Sharits, his mentor at Antioch College. Upon arrival in Chicago, however, Brand learned that, in fact, no printer existed--he had been recruited to build one. Meanwhile, Hock found himself in need of a financial stipend. At Schofill's behest, the pair was charged with fashioning a newly purchased Mauer camera and a heavy industrial lathe bed into a do-it-yourself (DIY) optical printer--"one piece at a time, putting things in place, modified as we went along," Hock recalled. Homemade optical printers (and their mass-produced offshoot, the JK optical printer) were appearing at other schools, too, providing the first generation of experimental film students with easier access to the technology. Within a decade, the optical printer became a mainstay of MFA programs and filmmaker's cooperatives, as fundamental to avant-garde practice as Bolex cameras and reversal stocks. Meanwhile, the practice itself became routinized, a skill that could be acquired. In hindsight, P. Adams Sitney remarked, "just as rapid editing with invisible splice marks had, for many filmmakers, become a mark of aesthetic authority in the early sixties, optical printing represented technical mastery in the seventies." His observation affirms that technical sophistication had become an important distinction in experimental filmmaking, but it also suggests that the optical printer came to instantiate aesthetic, cultural, and even philosophical values. What were these values, and where did they come from?"--

The Bolex camera, 16mm reversal film stocks, commercial film laboratories, and low-budget optical printers were the small-gauge media technologies that provided the infrastructure for experimental filmmaking at the height of its cultural impact. Technology and the Making of Experimental Film Culture examines how the avant-garde embraced these material resources and invested them with meanings and values adjacent to those of semiprofessional film culture. By reasserting the physicality of the body in making time-lapse and kinesthetic sequences with the Bolex, filmmakers conversed with other art forms and integrated broader spheres of humanistic and scientific inquiry into their artistic process. Drawing from the photographic qualities of stocks such as Tri-X and Kodachrome, they discovered pliant metaphors that allowed them to connect their artistic practice to metaphysics, spiritualism, and Hollywood excess. By framing film labs as mystical or adversarial, they cultivated an oppositionality that valorized control over the artistic process. And by using the optical printer as a tool for excavating latent meaning out of found footage, they posited the reworking of images as fundamental to the exploration of personal and cultural identity. Providing a wealth of new detail about the making of canonized avant-garde classics by such luminaries as Carolee Schneemann, Jack Smith, and Stan Brakhage, as well as rediscovering works from overlooked artists such as Chick Strand, Amy Halpern, and Gunvor Nelson, Technology and the Making of Experimental Film Culture uses technology as a lens for examining the process of making: where ideas come from, how they are put into practice, and how arguments about those ideas foster cultural and artistic commitments and communities.

Fiftieth anniversary reissue of the founding media studies book that helped establish media art as a cultural category. First published in 1970, Gene Youngblood’s influential Expanded Cinema was the first serious treatment of video, computers, and holography as cinematic technologies. Long considered the bible for media artists, Youngblood’s insider account of 1960s counterculture and the birth of cybernetics remains a mainstay reference in today’s hypermediated digital world. This fiftieth anniversary edition includes a new Introduction by the author that offers conceptual tools for understanding the sociocultural and sociopolitical realities of our present world. A unique eyewitness account of burgeoning experimental film and the birth of video art in the late 1960s, this far- ranging study traces the evolution of cinematic language to the end of fiction, drama, and realism. Vast in scope, its prescient formulations include “the paleocybernetic age,” “intermedia,” the “artist as design scientist,” the “artist as ecologist,” “synaesthetics and kinesthetics,” and “the technosphere: man/machine symbiosis.” Outstanding works are analyzed in detail. Methods of production are meticulously described, including interviews with artists and technologists of the period, such as Nam June Paik, Jordan Belson, Andy Warhol, Stan Brakhage, Carolee Schneemann, Stan VanDerBeek, Les Levine, and Frank Gillette. An inspiring Introduction by the celebrated polymath and designer R. Buckminster Fuller—a perfectly cut gem of countercultural thinking in itself—places Youngblood’s radical observations in comprehensive perspective. Providing an unparalleled historical documentation, Expanded Cinema clarifies a chapter of countercultural history that is still not fully represented in the arthistorical record half a century later. The book will also inspire the current generation of artists working in ever-newer expansions of the cinematic environment and will prove invaluable to all who are concerned with the technologies that are reshaping the nature of human communication.

A collection of papers discussing Los Angeles’s role in avant-garde, experimental, and minority filmmaking. Alternative Projections: Experimental Film in Los Angeles, 1945-1980 is a groundbreaking anthology that features papers from a conference and series of film screenings on postwar avant-garde filmmaking in Los Angeles sponsored by Filmforum, the Getty Foundation, and the University of Southern California’s School of Cinematic Arts, together with newly-commissioned essays, an account of the screening series, reprints of historical documents by and about experimental filmmakers in the region, and other rare photographs and ephemera. The resulting diverse and multi-voiced collection is of great importance, not simply for its relevance to Los Angeles, but also for its general discoveries and projections about alternative cinemas. “Alternative Projections provides a useful corollary and often a corrective to what has become a somewhat unilateral approach to experimental cinema in the period taken up here.” —Millennium Film Journal “[T]here are enough examples of ingenuity and achievement contained in this volume to unite a new generation of independent artists, exhibitors, and audiences in maintaining a viable outlet for cinematic creativity in Los Angeles.” —Los Angeles Review of Books

The 1970s was an enormously creative period for experimental film. Its innovations and debates have had far-reaching and long-lasting influence, with a resurgence of interest in the decade revealed by new gallery events, film screenings and social networks that recognise its achievements. Professor Laura Mulvey, and writer/director Sue Clayton, bring together journalists and scholars at the cutting edge of research into 1970s radical cinema for this collection. Chapters are at once historically grounded yet fused with the current analysis of today's generation of cine-philes, to rediscover a unique moment for extraordinary film production. Other Cinemas establishes the factors that helped to shape alternative film: world cinema and internationalism, the politics of cultural policy and arts funding, new accessible technologies, avant-garde theories, and the development of a dynamic and interactive relationship between film and its audiences. Exploring and celebrating the work of The Other Cinema, the London Film-makers' Co-op and other cornerstones of today's film culture, as well as the impact of creatives such as William Raban and Stephen Dwoskin - and Mulvey and Clayton themselves - this important book takes account of a wave of socially aware film practice without which today's activist, queer, minority and feminist voices would have struggled to gather such volume.

The past 40 years of technological innovation have significantly altered the materials of production and revolutionized the possibilities for experiment and exhibition. Not since the invention of film has there been such a critical period of major change in the imaging technologies accessible to artists. Bringing together key artists in film, video, and digital media, the anthology of Experimental Film and Video revisits the divergent philosophical and critical discourses of the 1970s and repositions these debates relative to contemporary practice. Forty artists have contributed images, and 25 artists reflect on the diverse critical agendas, contexts, and communities that have affected their practice across the period from the late 1960s to date. Along with an introduction by Jackie Hatfield and forewords by Sean Cubitt and Al Rees, this illustrated anthology includes interviews and recent essays by filmmakers, video artists, and pioneers of interactive cinema. Experimental Film and Video opens up the conceptual avenues for future practice and related critical writing.