Deals with topics usually discussed in treatises on "Jurisprudence"; more specifically, this work deals chiefly with the jurisprudence topic of "Rights."

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1884 edition. Excerpt: ... appendix Vl. Status and Capitis Deminutio. (to Sect. 64--68.) I. In the System of Law itself the conditions of Jural Capacity, as well as the gradations thereof, have been stated ( 64--67), and the doctrine of the threefold Capitis Deminutio has been joined thereto ( 68). The opinions of most Modern writers, however, diverge from the views there set forth in a twofold manner: Firstlv, by confounding a special doctrine of Status, a notion which has found no place in my exposition: Secondlv, by a wholly different notion of Minima Capitis Deminutio, whereby at the same time the general notion of Capitis Deminutio must receive an altered complexion. I will here give a preliminary summary of the most important Writers upon both these kindred subjects, in order to be able to refer to them more briefly in the following discussion: --Concerning Status. Feuerbach, Civilislische Versucheol. 1, Giessen, 1803, No. 6, pp. 175--190. Lohr iber den Status in the Magazin fur Rechtswissenschaft, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1--16, (1820). Concerning Capitis Deminutio. Hotomanus, Comm. adInst. ii.de Capitis Deminutione (1, 16). Conradi, Parerga, pp. 163--193 (1737). Gluck, Pandekten, Vol. 2, 128 (1791); Ducaurroy, Themis, Vol. 3, pp. 180--184(1821); Zimmern, Rechtsgeschichte, j, 2, 229 (1826); Seckendorf de Capilis Deminutione Minima, Colon. (1828). N1eburfR, Romische Geschichle, Vol. 1, p. 606 (4th ed.); Vol. 2, p. 460 (2nd ed.). Here the question is discussed in relation to the ancient Constitution of the State, and not from the standpoint of the Law Sources. ii. The customary doctrine of Moderns concerning Status runs in this wise (a). Status means a Quality, by virtue of which a (a) The matter is expressly discussed by Hopfner, Comment....